• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
Supreme Court Rebuffs Claims of Workplace Religious Bias

SCOTUS Preparing To Tackle Big Case, Will Impact Hundreds of Thousands of Children

May 31, 2021
Trump Endorses Both GOP Candidates in Arizona Race

CNN Gives Trump Nickname, Makes Him ‘Sound Super Cool’

August 13, 2025
JD Vance Shares He Makes ‘Sacred’ Time for Family Every Day

JD Vance Shares He Makes ‘Sacred’ Time for Family Every Day

August 13, 2025
Ashley Biden Files for Divorce After 13-Year Marriage

Ashley Biden Files for Divorce After 13-Year Marriage

August 13, 2025
HALEY KENNINGTON: Why We Need Hawley’s Stock Trade Ban

HALEY KENNINGTON: Why We Need Hawley’s Stock Trade Ban

August 13, 2025
BRAD WEISENSTEIN: Pritzker Says Gerrymander Can Be Gerry-More-Mandered If He Works At It

BRAD WEISENSTEIN: Pritzker Says Gerrymander Can Be Gerry-More-Mandered If He Works At It

August 13, 2025
Texas House Democrats Relent And Head Home

Texas House Democrats Relent And Head Home

August 12, 2025
Cali Dems Brag About LA Fire Rapid Rebuild While Most Victims Wait For Permits

Cali Dems Brag About LA Fire Rapid Rebuild While Most Victims Wait For Permits

August 12, 2025
Popular DC Influencer Asks Followers To Defend Honor Of City — It Backfired Badly

Popular DC Influencer Asks Followers To Defend Honor Of City — It Backfired Badly

August 12, 2025
Parents Don’t Have ‘Deeply Rooted’ Right To Trans Their Kids, Appeals Courts Find

Parents Don’t Have ‘Deeply Rooted’ Right To Trans Their Kids, Appeals Courts Find

August 12, 2025
Trump Admin Puts Multi-Million Dollar Bounty On Vicious Haitian Gangster Nicknamed ‘Barbecue’

Trump Admin Puts Multi-Million Dollar Bounty On Vicious Haitian Gangster Nicknamed ‘Barbecue’

August 12, 2025
Watch As Texas Dems Throw Tantrum, Storm Out Before Losing Redistricting Vote

Watch As Texas Dems Throw Tantrum, Storm Out Before Losing Redistricting Vote

August 12, 2025
ARUSHI SHARMA FRANK: What Should Be In The Strategic Blueprint For A 21st Century Grid?

ARUSHI SHARMA FRANK: What Should Be In The Strategic Blueprint For A 21st Century Grid?

August 12, 2025
  • Donald Trump
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Wednesday, August 13, 2025
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home News

SCOTUS Preparing To Tackle Big Case, Will Impact Hundreds of Thousands of Children

by Western Journal
May 31, 2021 at 7:28 am
in News
240 12
0
Supreme Court Rebuffs Claims of Workplace Religious Bias

FILE PHOTO: The Supreme Court is seen in Washington, U.S., December 11, 2020. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Supreme Court will soon be deciding on a landmark case that will determine where the law sees the line separating religious liberty from “LGBT rights” when it concerns foster children.

The case is none other than Fulton v. City of Philadelphia.

The case began in March 2018 when the Catholic Social Services sued the City of Philadelphia for blocking it from helping children find foster homes because the organization had a policy of not giving children to homosexual couples.

The CSS contested Philadelphia’s refusal to renew its contract with it. The organization argued that refusing to provide foster children to same-sex couples because they are homosexual couples falls within its right to free exercise of religion and free speech, even if there is no other “reason related to their qualifications to care for children,” according to The Oyez Project.

The plaintiffs lost in two lower courts before petitioning the Supreme Court, which decided to hear the case in February last year, Time reported.

According to the Supreme Court’s ruling written by Justice Antonin Scalia in the 1990 case of Employment Division v. Smith, Americans cannot claim exemptions to laws on the basis of religion “as long as those laws are neutral and generally applicable to everybody,” the outlet reported.

The Supreme Court decision for Fulton v. Philadelphia—the case to determine whether private agencies that receive taxpayer funding can discriminate against LGBTQ+ people—will be announced soon.

Sign up to join our virtual #DecisionDay rally at https://t.co/VoH4deFGkp. ? pic.twitter.com/pXdKWiu3Fr

— Lambda Legal (@LambdaLegal) May 22, 2021

However, according to Time magazine, the plaintiffs in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia argue that Philadelphia’s anti-discrimination law is not neutral or equally applicable.

Homosexual marriage was found to be protected by the Constitution in a 2015 Supreme Court ruling.  Many religious groups that run child-placement agencies refuse to compromise on religious values and will not place children in foster homes of gay couples, Time reported.

When the city of Philadelphia decided to no longer do business with Catholic Social Services because of that policy, two foster mothers, Sharonell Fulton and Toni Simms-Busch sued the city, along with CSS, Time reported.

Eleven states have passed laws allowing religious groups to refuse to work with homosexual couples. This, however, has reportedly left those states open to lawsuits filed by civil liberties groups, just as cities and states denying religious groups their right to refuse to send foster children to homosexual couples are open to lawsuits on religious liberty grounds.

Another consideration underlying this case is that the foster care system is overburdened, according to Time.

Lori Windham, the lawyer representing CSS, told Time: “The question is whether Philadelphia can exclude longtime foster moms and the religious agency they partner with because of their religious beliefs.”

Referring to the Catholic Church in Philadelphia’s 200-year-history in working with children who lost their parents, she reportedly said, “We’re talking about trying to take away an important support for foster parents and their children.”

When Time asked her why “CSS should be able to ignore laws that apply to everyone else,” Windham told the outlet that some regulations are “routinely ignored” in other circumstances.

“The city acknowledges that it considers factors like race and disability when it’s making foster care placements, something that’s prohibited by the law,” she told the outlet.

Experts believe that the court would lean towards the plaintiff, considering the court has six “conservative” justices, Time reported.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: ChildrenLGBTReligious FreedomSupreme CourtU.S. News
Share196Tweet123
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th