Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) is defending raising claims that âprovocateursâ and âfake Trump protestersâ planned the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.
During an interview with The New York Times, Johnson was asked about a piece from The Federalist he read from during a recent Senate hearing focused on the days leading up to the riots.
âI think itâs important, if weâre going to really get the whole truth, to understand exactly what happened, we need to look at different vantage points, different perspectives,â Johnson said.
He argued the author of the piece, J Michael Waller, looked like âhe had a pretty good background.â
âSo he seemed to be a knowledgeable observer,â Johnson said. He called Wallerâs piece âkind of an unblemished accounting.â
Johnson continued, âIâm not saying you accept everything. You donât necessarily accept his conclusions. I think you kind of have to take at face value what he said he saw.â
The lawmaker was asked how he could give âan audienceâ to Wallerâs claims there were either âprovocateursâ or âfake Trump supportersâ in the crowd when there is no evidence that it is true.
âIâm not questioning his veracity. I believe heâs probably telling the truth. Thatâs what he saw. Iâm not agreeing with any conclusions,â Johnson explained.
He added, âIâm not sure heâs really making too many conclusions, other than he concluded he saw four individual types of groups that stood out from the crowd.â
Johnson acknowledged it could be âa flawed part of the evidence.â He asked, âBut why exclude it?â
âIt might be a flawed part of the evidence, but why exclude it? Just because it doesnât necessarily tie into whatever narrative somebody else wants to tell about the day? Iâm not interested in the narratives, Iâm interested in the truth.â
The Times pressed Johnson on whether he checked Wallerâs story out to make sure it was true.
He replied, âWhat do you mean, checked out? Itâs his eyewitness account. What else is there to check out about it?â
Johnson continued, âI read what his credentials were, where he was teaching, at Fort Bragg. I mean, you can see in the article what his credentials are. He seemed to be pretty solid.â
He claimed people are âquickâ to label something a conspiracy theory or disinformation.
During the hearing, Johnson noted, â describes four different types of people â plainclothes militants, agents provocateurs, fake Trump protesters, and then disciplined uniform column of attackers.â
He suggested, âThese are the people that probably plannedâ the insurrection.
