Appleās āNapoleonā is already looking like a box office bomb.
The historical drama film, directed by Ridley Scott and based on the life of French revolutionary Napoleon Bonaparte, drastically underperformed in its opening weekend.
According to ScreenRant, the film will need to make $400 million in order to break even. So far, it has made $33 million on its opening weekend.
āNapoleonās significant budget comes with tremendous pressure,ā the outlet noted. āThe general rule of thumb is to double a filmās listed budget in order to gauge its production and marketing costs, meaning Napoleon needs to gross at least $400 million in order to constitute a profit.ā
āThe task is formidable, especially for an R-rated historical epic running a confirmed two hours and 38 minutes,ā it continued.
Compounding the pressure of low ticket sales, many filmgoers have also poured on the bad reviews.
The film, starring Academy Award winner Joaquin Phoenix as Napoleon, currently has a 60 percent approval audience score on Rotten Tomatoes.
āOverall felt disjointed,ā one audience member wrote. āIt feels like they forced story to be a movie when it wouldāve benefitted from being a show.ā
āThe cinematography was great but such a miss on the storyline,ā another added. āWould more historical context have been that difficult?ā
Many writers were also unimpressed with the film, which holds a 61 percent approval among critics.
āBy his own admission, this incarnation of Napoleon is only a cracked shell of what Scott originally wanted to deliver, so that it does not fully work is hardly a surprise,ā wrote Sara Michelle Fetters of MovieFreak.com.
āNapoleon contributes to a troubling trend in cinema, transforming significant historical narratives into hollow spectacles driven by mere visual Entertainment,ā added Manuel Bento of FandomWire.
However, not all were so critical, with some praising its cinematography and its portrayal of the French revolutionary emperor.
āāNapoleonā is consistently surprising partly because it doesnāt conform to the conventions of mainstream historical epics, which is especially true of its startling, adamantly unromanticized title character,ā wroteĀ Manohla Dargis of The New York Times.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
