blockversewordysbillionaire.aiyourlistWhiteboardAppquizieunschool

Loading

Want your own hosted, self-optimizing clone of this — or any OpenServe site? Open Development for enterprise →

© OpenServe Holdings LLC

Privacy Notice Data rights Terms of Service Feedback Cookie NoticeHelp Acceptable Use Copyright AI Notice Your Privacy Choices Subprocessors Data Processing Addendum Installed App Terms Company Solutions Free assessment Investors Get the app Contact

News

Home
Politics
World
Sports
Markets
Business
Entertainment
Music
Health
Tech
Science
Good News
Encouragement
Video
Meme Wars

Brands

Yourlist
Quizie
FaithTap
Blessed
How To
All brands

Opinion

Assistant District Attorney Out of a Job After Targeting Family Dog with Cruel Procedure in Plea Deal

I try to be slow to condemn the bone-headed statements of others, because I know I often need some grace in that regard myself. But some people, in some situations, make it harder than it should be. Take, for example…

IJR Syndicated·Jun 12, 2022·3 min read

Sponsored

I try to be slow to condemn the bone-headed statements of others, because I know I often need some grace in that regard myself.

But some people, in some situations, make it harder than it should be.

Take, for example, what an unnamed North Carolina assistant district attorney in Graham County suggested in a plea deal regarding a noise ordinance violation for a barking Dog.

Michael Eddings told WLOS that his Great Pyrenees, Leo, has cost him more than $750 in citations and attorney fees because of his loud barking.

Nonetheless, he was shocked by what the assistant DA offered to resolve the case at a Court hearing on May 31.

“He said that if you have the vocal cords removed surgically, they would drop all charges,” Eddings said.

WLOS didn’t name the assistant DA, and I can’t say as I blame them.

Sponsored

Assistant District Attorney Out of a Job After Targeting Family Dog with Cruel Procedure in Plea Deal — IJR

“It’s crazy,” Eddings said of the offer. “It is inhumane.”

Graham County District Attorney Ashley Welch didn’t name the assistant DA in her short statement to WLOS, either, but she seemed to agree with Eddings’ characterization of it.

“I have confirmed that an assistant district attorney in my district suggested, as a possible solution to violations of a town’s noise ordinance, that a Dog’s vocal cords be surgically altered,” she said. “Whether offered in jest or seriousness, the suggestion was inappropriate.

“I am unable to offer additional comment as this is now a personnel matter,” she added.

That implies two things: That the assistant DA tried to brush off the comment as a joke, and that the individual might be considering different career choices in the near future.

The latter implication was confirmed by WLOS in a follow-up story a few days later.

“An assistant district attorney who suggested a Dog’s vocal cords be surgically removed is no longer employed with the North Carolina office,” the outlet reported.

Was the ADA fired? Probably. Was termination justified? I already said that I’m trying not to be the guy who throws the first stone, so I’ll let you be the judge of that.

I will, however, say this: This anonymous assistant DA would have done well to remember what Jesus said about careless words.

“I tell you, on the day of judgment people will give account for every careless word they speak, for by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

I need to be reminded of those verses at least once a day.

Twice, if I plan to spend any time on Twitter.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.