Bill Clinton’s History While Under Oath Speaks For Itself

Former President Bill Clinton returned to familiar territory last week: answering questions under oath. But when lawmakers asked him directly whether he had ever lied in a deposition or under oath before, Clinton delivered a confident answer that immediately reignited one of the most infamous scandals in modern political history.

“No,” Clinton reportedly replied during a closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee led by Chairman James Comer.

The moment became even more tense when investigators presented Clinton with photographs showing him alongside disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. According to reports, Clinton’s legal team attempted to intercept some of the images before the former president reviewed them himself.

Clinton examined the photos and described Epstein as “odd,” while maintaining that he never witnessed any criminal behavior during their interactions.

The former president also reiterated long-standing claims that he never visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little St. James — a location prosecutors say served as a central hub in Epstein’s international sex trafficking operation. Clinton further denied any sexual contact with young women connected to Epstein and insisted he had no knowledge of the trafficking network that eventually brought down the financier.

The testimony quickly sparked criticism from observers who pointed out the extraordinary history surrounding Clinton’s past statements under oath.

During the 1990s, Clinton became the second president in American history to be impeached after a scandal involving former White House intern Monica Lewinsky. The controversy began with a sexual harassment lawsuit filed in 1994 by Paula Jones, who accused Clinton of misconduct during his time as governor of Arkansas.

While giving sworn testimony in the Jones case, Clinton denied having a sexual relationship with Lewinsky. That claim unraveled as evidence surfaced, including Lewinsky’s own testimony, recorded conversations, and DNA evidence linked to a now-famous blue dress.

The revelations triggered a political earthquake in Washington.