
A lawsuit against a school district in Colorado claims the district has violated legal obligations by repeatedly failing to address and fix the âhostile environment for Jewish studentsâ it has fostered.
The Boulder Valley School District (BVSD) has violated its obligations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act based on antisemitic discrimination, a legal complaint submitted by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) claims. A Jewish middle school student in the district has faced antisemitic bullying, harassment, and physical assault by multiple other students for two consecutive years, per the document.
BVSD, located in a deep blue county, has been known for left-wing policies. One hundred of the districtâs teachers partook in training âthrough A Queer Endeavor, a sexuality and gender identity Education initiativeâ in 2016, according to The Denver Post. The training was intended to make the word âgayâ more accepted and change school culture by including gay and transgender figures in school lessons.
âWhile the Boulder Valley School District does not comment on ongoing legal matters, we take all allegations of discrimination and harassment seriously,â a BVSD spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation in a statement. âWe continue to focus on improvements to our policies, reporting systems, practices, and Education effortsâall with the goal of ensuring every BVSD student feels safe, welcomed, and a strong sense of belonging.â
The alleged antisemitism began with pejorative remarks directed at the Jewish student by classmates, and escalated to verbal slurs, threats and Nazi salutes in 2024, according to the court document. This then âprogressed to repeated physical assaults (including strangulation), antisemitic taunting in the lunch line, after school and in class,â and Holocaust-related mockery.
The mockery included a classmate telling the Jewish student, âat least my grandma didnât spend 8 years in hiding,â and asking the Jewish student, âdo you get scared when someone raises their hand?â and âdo you get scared when someone counts to nine?â according to the legal complaint.
In April 2025, after the Jewish student had endured hate speech and physical violence, the studentâs father requested âa significant increase in supervision and greater engagement with parents regarding the rise of this behavior in the school,â according to the legal complaint.
The school investigated the conduct of a classmate of the Jewish student after receiving a formal bullying complaint. The classmate had attempted get other students to play a game called âJew touch tag,â in which âbeing Jewish would make one the student to be chased,â reported the legal complaint. The same classmate has also been reported by witnesses to have called Jews âdirtyâ and âcontaminated.â The school found that its bullying policy had been violated and the Board Policy AC (Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity) applied. The school documented the findings in a records system, âwith a formal founded determination.â
In May 2025, at the end of the studentâs 7th grade year, his father requested that the student not be placed in classes with specific classmates who had harassed the Jewish student, according to the complaint. If that was not possible, then he stated he would request a school transfer for his son.
The Southern Hills Middle School (SHMS) principal committed to doing the schoolâs âbestâ to avoid scheduling conflicts, but did formally commit to it, nor honor it, according to the court document. She said that if the family felt they would like an administrative transfer, she could âwork through that process.â But no transfer was facilitated.
In December 2025, a classmate of the Jewish student âfashioned a Chromebook charging cord into a lassoâ during a study hall, threw it around the Jewish studentâs neck, and dragged the student from a chair while calling them a slur, according to the court document. This conduct resulted in âa police report, a formal founded bullying determination by SHMS, and a Juvenile Court Referral for third-degree assault.â
Despite the schoolâs finding, police involvement, and Juvenile Court Referral, the districtâs consequence for the classmate who physically assaulted the Jewish student was to suspend the classmate for the remainder of the week and reassign the Jewish student to a different study hall section the following semester, according to the court document.
The BVSD is a district of âxcellence and quity,â according to its website. The complaint notes that the districtâs board policies include bullying prevention policy and Board Policy AC (Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity). But, âdespite these policies, the District has failed, repeatedly and systematically, to enforce themâ on the Jewish studentâs behalf, reported the complaint.
In January 2026, the Jewish studentâs parents requested support from the school before sending their child back after winter break. The parents requested a no-contact order between their child and the student who physically assaulted their child, âline-of-sight supervisionâ of their child at all times, that their child be excused from changing for gym class and go to the office instead of attending study halls, according to the legal complaint.
The school offered a break space in the office/counseling area, a no-contact agreement between the Jewish student and the classmate who assaulted them, and two other terms of support, per the lawsuit. The school did not agree to the line-of-sight supervision request.
The bully violated the no-contact order on the first day it took effect and was suspended for a several days, according to the legal complaint. But âthe violations did not stop, and the hostile environment continued to intensify.â
The parents of the Jewish student put the school and BVSD âon actual notice of antisemitic harassment in November 2024 and have continued to provide them with written, documented, and urgent notice through the present,â according to the legal document. In April 2025, the school âproduced a founded determination of antisemitic bullying.â The Boulder Police Department âopened two cases and has issued a juvenile criminal referral for third-degree assault.â âFormal written demands for protective supervision were submittedâ by the studentâs parents.
âDespite all of this, the District failed to put into place systemic changes to address the continued antisemitic harassmentâ the Jewish student has been facing and âhas consistently placed the burden of avoiding the hostile environment on âthe student â not on those responsible for creating it,â the legal complaint claims.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterâs byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
