
The University of Maryland (UMD) must allow a pro-Palestinian student groupĀ to host a vigil on Oct. 7, a district court ruled Tuesday.
The Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapter sued UMD in September after the university canceled their event request despite initially approving it, saying in a statement that only āuniversity-sponsored events that promote reflectionā would be allowed on Oct.7, the one-year anniversary of Hamasā deadly attack on Israel that began the war in Gaza. The university cited safety concerns and ānumerous calls ⦠to cancel and restrict the events that take place that dayā in the statement, but Clinton-appointed Judge Peter J. Messitte agreed with the SJP chapter that preventing the event violated the First Amendment, according to court documents.
āThe grave harm the University cites is the potential disruption and violence that it believes will follow if the October 7 event goes forward,ā the Messitteās decision reads. āBut in the Courtās view the decision of the University to revoke SJPās reservation was clearly neither viewpoint- nor content-neutral. It came about for reasons that the Constitution simply does not countenance: fear of disruption, and anger of opponents. Again, the case authority emphatically rejects these reasons.ā
The court clarified that the university could still enforce its conduct rules and had a right to punish students who violate university policy.
āhile speech and slogans by SJP will be permitted on October 7, any negative conduct not protected by the First Amendment will not be ā including any incitement to imminent violence, physical or verbal threats, impeding access of any students to class or buildings, property damage of any sort, the occupation of buildings, encampments, and, in general, defiance of reasonable crowd control measures employed by security personnel,ā Messitte wrote. āViolators may be subject to arrest and/or ouster from the campus. The Universityās policy requirements with respect to campus events as they presently stand will apply in full.ā
Messitte also added that āit remains entirely plausible that the university may need to beef up its security personnelā for the event and said UMDĀ should be prepared in case protests erupt.
āIt simply cannot be said with assurance that personal threats, violence, and property damage as a result of campus protests involving Gaza, given recent experience around the country, will not occur,ā Messitte wrote. āBut, as stated before, there are less restrictive alternatives to meet these potential challenges short of suppressing expressive conduct under the First Amendment.ā
Anti-IsraelĀ protests initially erupted on college campuses in 2023 and resulted in numerous arrests,Ā widespreadĀ damagesĀ and in some cases turnedĀ violent, though many students faced little to no discipline for the events. Protests remain a constant on campuses withĀ Cornell University seeing outbreaks on the very first day of classes this year.
āToday, Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Maryland has achieved a historic victory,ā the group wroteĀ in an Instagram post. āWe refuse to allow attempts to cancel our reservations to stop our message.ā
UMD did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundationās request for comment.
(Featured Image Media Credit:Ā Nathan Neve/Unsplash)
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterās byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactĀ [email protected].
