‘Fundamentally Un-American’: Crenshaw Alleges Disastrous Relationship Between Dem Party and Big Tech

The scene was Capitol Hill as the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing on Big Tech. But as Republican Rep. Dan Crenshaw of Texas spoke about the core challenge being imposed by technology that could not…

IJR SyndicatedDec 3, 20213 min read

Sponsored

“This is a very fundamental question because free speech is very messy. Our founders knew that when they wrote the First Amendment.”

Crenshaw said the downside of democracy beats the upside of censorship.

“It can result in all sorts of chaos and pain and hurt feelings because the human race is indeed what it is,” he said. “But let’s be clear that it’s a heck of a lot better than the alternative.”

Crenshaw noted that having a group of so-called experts decide who should read what is totally wrong.

“This independent oversight committee being discussed with an elite, unaccountable few regulating what we see and what we don’t. I don’t want us to go down that path,” he said.

Crenshaw noted that while Republicans want to unshackle free speech, that’s not the desire of Congressional Democrats.

“I want to be clear about something else. Republicans and Democrats do not agree on this issue,” he said.

“I’ve observed a clever strategy by the media and some of my colleagues implying that we all agree, that we’re all moving in the right direction towards the same thing: We’re all mad at Big Tech. This is not really true; we have very different views of the problem.”

Crenshaw said that in any contest of what is most important to this nation, the freedom of every American to speak his or her mind must win out.

“One of the bills being considered today puts companies on the hook for any content that causes severe emotional injury, which remains undefined and open to interpretation,” he said.

“It’s fundamentally un-American that your hurt feelings should dictate my free speech,” he said.

Crenshaw said there is an unholy partnership between Big Tech and Democrats.

“I think the Democrat Party want to censor based on vague interpretations of harmful speech and misinformation, which invariably means things they just disagree with. They can’t legally infringe on the First Amendment, so bully Big Tech into doing it for you,” he said.

“We can’t go down this path.”

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.