
Journalist Katie Couric attempted to push Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman to criticize slain Turning Point USA (TPUSA) founder Charlie Kirk on âNext Question with Katie Couricâ Thursday, but the senator declined to do so.
After the Sept. 10 assassination, some celebrated Kirkâs murder and attacked his rhetoric, leading to multiple firings. Couric noted on her podcast that critics opposed President Donald Trumpâs administration honoring Kirk posthumously, but Fetterman expressed no objections.
WATCH:
âDo you think that flags should have been flown at half-staff? Do you think his body should have been flown on Air Force Two? Do you think he should have posthumously been given the Presidential Medal of Freedom?â Couric asked. âI think some people felt that that was perhaps over the top in terms of mourning someone like Charlie Kirk. How did you feel about that?â
âIâd say that that was his choice and his prerogative, and that was really entirely up to him,â Fetterman said.
Couric followed up by asking if Fetterman, in hindsight, had problems with Kirkâs rhetoric. The senator responded that he had disagreements with Kirk, but was not especially familiar with his views.
âIâm sure you learned about them after his death, though,â Couric pressed.
âNo, I havenât done a deep dive on it,â Fetterman asserted.
The senator discussed viewing the horrific video of Kirkâs killing and condemned political violence as âunacceptable.â
âAnd engaging in a debate and views I strongly disagree on â thatâs part of the American democracy. And for me, that would never justify whatâs happened,â he said. âAnd I just chose not to take the opportunity to argue his views after children lost father in the most violent public way.â
Fetterman also denounced âextreme rhetoric,â suggesting it contributes to events like Kirkâs assassination and calling for Americans to be less incendiary.
âI think some people might say Charlie Kirkâs rhetoric was extreme,â Couric claimed. âYou know, I think thatâs the conversation that happened. People condemned political violence, but they also felt a great deal of discomfort with his language, suggesting that these kinds of words lead to violence. I donât know. Iâm just kind of sharing my observations as I saw the conversations unfold.â
âYeah, I agree. I mean, I think we agree that we probably didnât agree with much of what he said. And Iâm sure we both agree that you shouldnât shoot people and you shouldnât execute them in public,â Fetterman replied. âAnd I think two things must be true: that free speechâIâm an absolute free speech guy and you have the right to say these things. And you definitely also have the right not to get shot by sharing your views.â
Members of the media and others with large online followings misled their audiences on Kirkâs views on topics such as race and sexuality following his assassination.
The New York Times had to issue a correction on Sept. 11 for incorrectly attributing an antisemitic comment to Kirk in an article detailing his overall political views.
âAn earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast,â the correction states. âHe was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement.â
Moreover, Fetterman said on Fox Newsâ âJesse Watters Primetimeâ on Nov. 3 that he refuses to demonize his opposition.
âIâm not gonna call you a fascist or a Nazi. Iâm not gonna compare anyone to Hitler or anything,â he said at the time. âThatâs wrong. And if you resort to that thing, youâve lost the plot.â
Couric admitted on a Nov. 6 episode of her podcast that she no longer strives to be âimpartialâ when covering Trump, claiming the presidentâs conduct is âbeyond the pale.â
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterâs byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
