
Once upon a time, journalists demanded āaccessā to presidential candidates. Suddenly, Democratic nominee Vice President Kamala Harrisā calculated refusal to do a solo sit-down interview becomes a nonissue.
Harris served as President Joe Bidenās co-pilot and cannot credibly distance herself from the 40-year high in inflation, from gas prices 50% higher than four years ago and from the millions of illegal aliens who have entered the country in the last four years, so her media avoidance is tactically smart.
The Trump-hating, pro-Democrat media and pundit class are perfectly OK with this. Rather than face blistering criticism for ignoring or disowning the many radical positions Harris has taken in the not-so-distant past, she is being praised.
Former President Donald Trump, for example, denounced the Harris-Tim Walz interview as āboring.ā MSNBCās opinion editor wrote: ā(Trump) wasnāt wrong about that. But I think Harris is banking on votersā choosing boring over the drama ā no, letās be real and call it the chaos ā that Trump inevitably brings.ā
About Harrisā vacuous politics of joy and good vibes, CNN presidential historian Tim Naftali said: āIt has been effective in American history. Franklin Roosevelt ran on the New Deal, of course, he was running at a time of economic collapse, and he was running against an incumbent. But he didnāt actually say what the New Deal was. ⦠John F. Kennedy ran promising to make the country move again.
Well, how vague is that? He ran a vibes campaign for the most part in 1960. Richard Nixon in 1968 promised to end the war in Vietnam, but didnāt say how we would do it. ⦠And 2008, Barack Obama promised change. He did promise some policy changes, of course, but he was basically saying, āāWeāve had enough with the Bush administration. Weāve had enough with its wars. So historically, a vibes campaign can be very effective.ā
Did Roosevelt, Kennedy, Nixon and Obama treat the media like an infectious disease? So, Harrisā agenda of ājoyā and āvibesā should soothe the two-thirds of Americans who consider the nation on the āwrong trackā? This silliness works because the media is complicit. They cannot abide Trumpās ālies.ā But Biden and Harris can lie with impunity.
In a July interview with NBCās Lester Holt, Biden again pushed the Trump-Charlottesville āboth sidesā lie. No pushback from Holt.
Harris told CNNās Dana Bash that Trump bushwhacked a conservative border bill. Bash failed to point out that several Republicans spoke out against the bill before Trump did; that this ātoughā border bill, among many problems, permits an annual floor of 1.8 million new illegal entrants; and, most importantly, Trump secured the border without any congressional action ā and Biden could do likewise by simply reinstating the Trump policies he started reversing on his first day as president.
CNNās Wolf Blitzer recently allowed not one but two guests in the same segment to refer falsely to Trump as a āconvicted rapist.ā
Biden and Harris brag, with no media pushback, about ācreating 16 million new jobs.ā Never mind that 10 million of these ānewā jobs were bounce-backs from COVID and that the economy was recovering well before Biden-Harris took over and unnecessarily spent trillions, triggering the inflation that peaked at 9%.
Television journalists routinely allow guests/pundits/politicians/surrogates to call Trump āfascist.ā But isnāt it fascist for government to pressure social media platforms into suppressing dissent about COVID; for government to pressure social media platforms into restricting the Hunter Biden laptop story; and for Harris to propose price controls?
About Harrisā āflip-floppingā on fracking, former New York Times columnist Anand Giridharadas on MSNBC said: āI think sometimes we in journalism shame people kind of figuring out a different view that they might hold and call it flip-flopping and try to kind of catch people in it when, in some ways, on some issues, thatās a measure of progress. ⦠Sheās in a general election against an American fascist, Donald Trump.ā
A 2022 poll by Syracuse University found just 3.4% of reporters are Republicans. According to the Media Research Center, the ABC/NBC/CBS recent news coverage of Harris-Walz has been 84% positive, while that of Trump-Vance is 89% negative.
Welcome to modern journalism. Water is wet. Sky is blue. Trump is a fascist.
Larry Elder is a bestselling author and nationally syndicated radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an āElderado,ā visit www.LarryElder.com. Follow Larry on Twitter @larryelder. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
COPYRIGHT 2024 LAURENCE A. ELDER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
(Featured Image Media Credit:Ā Screen Capture/CSPAN)
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterās byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactĀ [email protected].
