
Climate change does not poll well so Vice President Kamala Harris is downplaying the whole issue. Gone is the drumbeating that nothing is more important to the next generation than addressing climate change.
During the presidential debate with former President Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris turned the moderatorâs question about climate change into a discussion about housing insurance costs.
She declared climate change was âvery realâ and then she pivoted to what NPR described as morphing climate change into a âpocketbook issue.â
âYou ask anyone who lives in a state who has experienced these extreme weather occurrences who now is either being denied home insurance or itâs being jacked up; you ask anybody who has been the victim of what that means in terms of losing their home, having nowhere to go,â Harris said during the debate.
Why has the climate issue, formerly known as an âexistential threatâ â complete with doomsday tipping points â now turned into a question of mere insurance costs for the Democratic presidential nominee? The Washington Post reported that Democratic Party leaders âappear to have calculated that climate silence is the safest strategy.â The Post explained, âDemocrats see talking about the environment as a lose-lose proposition.â
When Harris was finally asked about âclimate changeâ during her first sit-down media interview on CNN, she addressed her recent campaign reversals on fracking, EVs and net zero issues by claiming her âvaluesâ have not changed.
Harris told CNN that there is a âclimate crisisâ and the way to solve it was by spending âa trillion dollarsâ and applying âmetrics that include holding ourselves to deadlines around time.â
Huh? So, Harrisâ position on the alleged threat of man-made climate change still duplicates her 2019 brief presidential run. Her repeated claims that she will no longer seek to âbanâ fracking do not address the fact that continuing Green New Deal and Inflation Reduction Act policies will result in a death by a thousand cuts on fracking and other U.S. Energy production methods.
She pledged to continue the ideological net zero fairy-tale that government spending and mandates can alter the Earthâs climate system. Harrisâ Energy plans will continue to hammer America first.
Letâs remember that Harrisâ âvaluesâ have included being an original co-sponsor of AOCâs Green New Deal, casting a tie-breaking vote in 2022 for the Inflation Reduction Act, supporting gas-powered car bans, gas stove bans, looking at climate change as one of the âroot causesâ of illegal immigration, and meat restrictions via the administrationâs EPA regulations on agricultural methane emissions.
In addition, the Biden-Harris administration has talked openly about the possibility of declaring a national climate emergency which â according to NBC News â âcan unlock special powers for a president in a crisis without needing approval from Congress.â
Bypassing democracy to impose a Green New Deal on America appears central to Harrisâ âvalues.â But somehow her âvaluesâ have rapidly gone silent on the alleged âexistentialâ climate threat of the 21st century during this heated presidential campaign.
If you listen closely, the Harris âsilenceâ fades away. The Harris campaign raucously boasted to Reuters, that the âclimate silenceâ is all part of her master election plan.
âShe has been pursuing a policy of âstrategic ambiguityâ on Energy policy, aides told Reuters last month. She is anxious not to put off undecided voters in swing states, especially gas-producing Pennsylvania, by trumpeting her climate credentials too loudly.â
âToo loudly?!â The only Harris climate âvaluesâ that seem to matter are âstrategic ambiguityâ â otherwise known as deception.
The reality is that Harrisâ âclimate silenceâ is a concession to scientific reality and the failed solar and wind promises that are causing a pointless drain on the U.S. economy. The public has been hearing for years of how solar and wind are âcheaperâ than fossil fuels and how they are about to replace fossil fuels. But the reality is starkly the opposite of these claims and the Democrat Party knows this.
Despite trillions of dollars in subsidies, green Energy mandates, UN climate summits, net zero commitments and restrictions on fossil fuels, solar & wind power made up just 13.9% of the worldâs electricity in 2023. Meanwhile, the U.S. still consumed 82% of our Energy from fossil fuels in 2023.
When these Energy realities are screaming in your face, silence may be the only answer.
The most surprising aspect of the Harris-Walz climate shush campaign may be why the climate establishment has no qualms about muzzling climate change. The New York Times reported that â has mentioned climate change only in passingâ and noted that âlimate leaders say they are fine with that.â
Why are climate activists suddenly âfineâ with their standard bearers hushing up on climate during a heated presidential race? Perhaps the answer can be found in the advice of Democratic Party activist Rev. Mark Thompson at the August DNC convention in Chicago, when he declared, âWe got 70 days to act right, yâall. Now, after 70 days, we can go back to acting crazy, right?â he said. Thompson added, âJust wait 70 days to go back, please. Be good.â
Letâs hope Americans can glean the climate âcrazyâ blaring from Harris-Walzâs sham âclimate silenceâ campaign.
Marc Morano, a former senior staffer for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, is the executive editor and chief correspondent for ClimateDepot.com.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterâs byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
