Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation as a justice on the Supreme Court has led to questions about Roe v. Wade as her confirmation cements a conservative majority. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) believes Barrett would not vote to overturn the decision.

Murkowski told reporters on Monday prior to the Senate’s vote, ā€œI don’t see her overturning the decision in Roe v. Wade, based on — based on the weighting of the reliance factors,ā€ according to The Hill.

The Republican senator continued, ā€œI believe, that given how she outlined, not only to me but how she spoke to the issue of reliance when she was before the committee, I believe that she will look at that and weight that in any matters, in any cases that come before her that take up Roe v. Wade.ā€

The Supreme Court made a 7-2 decision on Roe v. Wade in 1973 which ā€œaffirms the legality of a woman’s right to have an Abortion under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution,ā€ as CNN reports.

Murkowski — who voted yes to confirm Barrett — supports a woman’s right to choose, but with some limits. The senator met with Barrett on Monday and the two spoke about ā€œwhat that means to overturn, potentially overturn something, that generations of women are relying on.ā€

The senator later said:

ā€œI think if you were to ask Judge Barrett for a document that you could point to that says clearly that she would vote to overturn she would say you’re not going to find one.ā€

Murkowski also repeated, ā€œFairly weighting and evaluating, I believe she won’t vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.ā€

Advertisement

Amid Barrett’s confirmation, the topic of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was pushed forward by Democrats over concerns it would be struck down. However, Murkowski says she believes ā€œthe ACA will not be thrown out.ā€

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) slammed President Donald Trump and Republican senators after Barrett’s confirmation, saying in a statement, ā€œNow, Americans must continue to make their voices heard in the election. Congress will have to reverse the damage of a radical Republican court and defend pre-existing condition protections together with every other benefit and protection of the Affordable Care Act.ā€