No. 2 GOP Sen Says Republicans Will Move Quickly To Speed Up Confirmation Of Stalled Trump Nominees 

Senate Republicans are moving to draft a proposal that would expedite the confirmation process for the 145 stalled Trump nominees awaiting floor consideration.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso said Wednesday that Republicans are aiming to vote on changing Senate rules to expeditiously confirm dozens of the president’s picks by the end of next week before the upper chamber adjourns for the Rosh Hashanah recess on Sept. 22. The measure — while still being fleshed out — is likely to engender resistance from Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and could force Republicans to change Senate rules unilaterally.

“We’re working up the proposal right now, going to talk to our members and make sure that we have the votes ready to go to make sure the president has his team in place,” Barrasso told reporters Wednesday. “There is significant support across the entire conference to making sure that the president gets the team in place to get America back on track.”

Though Senate GOP leadership has yet to get behind a specific solution, Barrasso floated a rules change that would allow nominees who advance out of the same committee to be confirmed en bloc by voice vote or unanimous consent on the Senate floor.

The Wyoming Republican said the proposal would expedite the confirmation process for the hundreds of lower-level executive branch nominees who require Senate confirmation to serve in their postings. It is unclear if Senate Republicans will also seek to speed up the confirmations of district court nominees who have been subject to Democrats’ stalling tactics.

Senate Democrats have sought to delay the confirmation process for nearly all of Trump’s executive branch and judicial nominees. Trump, in his second term, is the first president on record to not have a single civilian nominee confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent at this point in his presidency.

Schumer has boasted about his caucus’ delay tactics, arguing “historically bad nominees deserve historic levels of scrutiny.”