In July of 2020, New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez â 25 percent of âthe squadâ and the source of roughly 75 percent of its bad laughs â tweeted that âcancel cultureâ wasnât really a thing. And even if it were, it would be a good thing.
âThe term âcancel cultureâ comes from entitlement â as though the person complaining has the right to a large, captive audience,& one is a victim if people choose to tune them out,â Ocasio-Cortez wrote.
âOdds are youâre not actually cancelled, youâre just being challenged, held accountable, or unliked.â
Someone should show that tweet to AOCâs fellow squad member, Rep. Ilhan Omar.
The Minnesota Democrat isnât just complaining that sheâs getting canceled for her frequent anti-Semitic utterances. No, Omar says â youâre literally putting her life at risk by calling out her bigotry.
And by the way, thereâs not a whole lot of calling out going on. When Omar released a video in June in which she compared Israel and the U.S. to terrorist groups, barely anyone in her party was there to condemn her remarks.
âWe must have the same level of accountability and justice for all victims of crimes against humanity,â Omar tweeted in the midst of fighting between Hamas and Israel. âWe have seen unthinkable atrocities committed by the U.S., Hamas, Israel, Afghanistan, and the Taliban.â
At the time, all the Democrats could muster was a statement signed by 12 representatives stating, âThe United States and Israel are imperfect and, like all democracies, at times deserving of critique, but false equivalencies give cover to terrorist groups. ⌠We urge Congresswoman Omar to clarify her words placing the US and Israel in the same category as Hamas and the Taliban.â
But Omar said she was the victim.
âEvery time I speak out on human rights I am inundated with death threats,â she tweeted on June 9. She included the audio of one of them: âMuslims are terrorists. ⌠And every anti-American communist piece of s*** that works for her, I hope you get whatâs f***ing coming for you.â
She then blamed both Fox News and GOP Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, both of whom drew attention to Omarâs latest bout of anti-Semitism. âIt is enabled by a political cultureâin both partiesâthat allows and often fuels Islamophobia,â she added.
WARNING: The following video contains graphic language that some viewers will find offensive.
In other words, donât criticize her for being an anti-Semite, or else sick people will leave her rebarbative messages. By holding her accountable, Fox and Boebert were literally threatening her life.
Now, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee is threatening Omar using her own words, too.
According to Israeli news service Haaretz, the AIPAC â â the biggest pro-Israel lobby in the U.S. â has taken out a series of Facebook ads targeting Democrats who have made statements about Israel ranging from the irresponsible to the anti-Semitic.
In Omarâs case, the ad reads, âFor Ilhan Omar, there is no difference between America and the Taliban. Between Israel and Hamas. Between democracies and terrorists. Tell Rep. Omar: Condemn terrorists, not America.â
In a Wednesday tweet, Omarâs communications director accused the AIPAC of putting her life at risk.
âThe language AIPAC uses in paid ads to smear and vilify is virtually identical to the language used in death threats she gets. Make no mistake: AIPAC is putting Rep. Omarâs life at risk with repeated Islamophobic attack ads,â Jeremy Slevin tweeted.
He included screen shots of the AIPAC ad and the threatening message Omar received and tweeted on June 9.
âIt shouldnât have to be stated, but baselessly linking Muslim-Americans to terrorism is *the* textbook example of Islamophobia and is routinely used to silence advocacy for Palestinian human rights,â Slevin added.
I donât know if itâs possible to catalog every way those tweets are misguided, but letâs try.
First, the language in the AIPAC ad and Omarâs death threat tweet are not âvirtually identicalâ â in fact, they have nothing in common.
Second, the AIPAC is using Omarâs own words. Did Slevin not watch his bossâ video? If he did, his position is that one shouldnât hold Omar accountable because the very act puts her in danger.
Third, the ad isnât baselessly linking Muslim Americans to terrorism. Itâs pointing out that a Muslim American equated Israel and the U.S. to terrorists. (For what itâs worth, the AIPAC also ran ads criticizing leftists who arenât Muslim for saying similarly cretinous things, as Haaretz reported.)
Finally, if Omar is advocating for âPalestinian human rights,â the Palestinians probably need a more effective advocate. Progressives arenât going to get much traction with false equivalencies between democracies and terrorist groups.
Letâs not forget that Omar didnât make her comments in a vacuum. Sheâs arguably been the most open and prolific anti-Semite in Congress in at least half a century â and sheâs only been in office since 2019.
Is Ilhan Omar an anti-Semite?
YesNo
Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes: 100% (4 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)
đş Embedded media â coming soon
In February of 2019, Omar tweeted that U.S. policy toward Israel was âall about the Benjamins,â implying that Jewish money was buying American influence.
Later that month, she brought up the anti-Semitic canard that Jewish-Americans have dual loyalties: âI want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is OK to push for allegiance to a foreign country,â she said at a panel discussion, according to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
When Democratic Rep. Nita Lowey of New York called her on it, Omar repeated the nonsense in a tweet, saying she âshould not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee.â
In July of 2019, she introduced a resolution to the House of Representatives supporting Israeli boycotts, likening them to boycotts of Nazi Germany.
To paraphrase the words of Ocasio-Cortez, the idea that Omar deserves to be protected from her own speech comes from a sense of entitlement â as though sheâs a victim if people push back on her using her own rhetoric.
Odds are sheâs not being threatened by the AIPAC, sheâs just being challenged, held accountable and unliked.
If the public fallout from her words and actions makes her uncomfortable, thereâs a solution to that â and it doesnât involve playing the victim.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
