Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky suggested that White House medical adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci might have helped fund the COVID-19 pandemic by bankrolling Chinaās Wuhan Institute of Virology, which some scientists say is the likely source of the virus.
āUltimately, hereās the rub. I donāt know whether it came from the lab. Nobody knows whether it came from the lab,ā Paul, a physician, said Tuesday on Fox Newsā āFox & Friends.ā āBut who would be culpable? Dr. Fauci could be culpable for the entire pandemic.ā
The senator said there is documented proof that Fauciās division of the National Institutes of Health ā the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases ā gave hefty grants to the Wuhan Institute, which used the funding to perform āgain-of-functionā research into bat coronaviruses.
Gain-of-function research involves transforming pathogens into mutant āsupervirusesā by making them deadlier and more contagious.
Theoretically, thatās what people would do if they wanted to create a bioweapon. Like other countries, the United States does some gain-of-function research.
Paul slammed Fauci for denying that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases funded labs that perform gain-of-function research.
The senator said Fauci is blatantly lying because thereās a paper trail going back years showing that the NIAID did indeed bankroll this dangerous research in communist China.
āDr. Shi , the ābat scientistā ā thatās the most famous one from the Wuhan Institute ā when she published her papers, which scientists across the board are saying are gain of function, they were juicing up viruses ā she gave credit to Dr. Fauci,ā Paul said.
Do you believe COVID-19 came from the Wuhan lab?
YesNo
Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes: 0% (0 Votes)
No: 0% (0 Votes)
šŗ Embedded media ā coming soon
āWe have this in black and white from a peer-reviewed journal: She said the funding came from Dr. Fauciās National Institute, NIAID. This is Dr. Fauciās baby for 40 years. She lists him in the credits.
āHe canāt escape this. He did the funding.ā
Fauci has been the director of the NIAID since 1984.
The senator said he doesnāt understand why the Wuhan Institute got money from a U.S. agency in the first place when China is a wealthy nation that can easily fund its own research.
Paul also accused the NIH and the World Health Organization of a coverup to hide the origins of the Coronavirus.
This is unethical because there are major conflicts of interest when the person who gave the money to the lab accused of creating the Coronavirus is then assigned to investigate where the destructive virus originated.
āThe person they appointed to investigate the lab from the WHO perspective is the guy who gave the money,ā Paul explained. āSo NIH gave the money to a group called EcoHealth. The head of EcoHealth ā a guy named Daszak ā they got him to investigate whether Wuhan was doing anything inappropriate in their lab. But if they were, wouldnāt he then be culpable?
āSo doesnāt he have a self-interest in smoothing things over? Iām not saying he did cover things up, but you wouldnāt appoint someone whoās in the line of the supply chain, of giving the money to them.ā
Shockingly, U.S. tax dollars will be financing the Wuhan Institute of Virology for three more years.
The current director of the NIH is Dr. Francis Collins, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama in 2009.Ā In February, the NIH approved the use of more taxpayer money to fund the Wuhan Instituteās ongoing research until 2024.
This entire episode is so mind-boggling that it sounds like an ominous Science-fiction fantasy.
Fauci already has done incalculable damage with his unscientific, flip-floppingCoronavirus guidelines, which Democrats and their media lapdogs immediately browbeat Americans to submit to.
But if it turns out that Fauci is also culpable for a pandemic that killed scores of people, decimated the U.S. economy and led to the imposition of restrictions on Americansā civil liberties, he should not only be fired but vigorously prosecuted.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
