The markup process for legislation in either house of Congress usually isnât the venue for heated rhetoric, but Tuesday was the exception.
The occasion was the markup of several bills before the House Judiciary Committee, the highest-profile of them the âCOVID-19 Hate Crimes Act,â according to Fox News.
The deliberation comes amid a spending spree by Democrats and a parallel issue for the majority party, the troubling rhetoric of several of its members in regards to law enforcement.
GOP Rep. Chip Roy of Texas took issue with both during his remarks in committee.
After another member noted nothing was being cut in terms of services, Roy said police budgets were the biggest casualty of the past year, pointing to âdramatic cuts and attacks on law enforcement.â
Austin, Texas â ârun by Democrats,â as Roy pointed out â slashed its police budget significantly in the wake of the George Floyd protests last year.
He said police there âare absolutely demoralized. They are crushed. Go talk to the law enforcement. They are fleeing the city.â
Austin takes money from the federal government and now, Roy said, the city struggles with a serious homeless problem.
But meanwhile, what are prominent Democrats saying about police officers?
Letâs first take Rep. Maxine Waters of California, who made a detour to Minnesota on Saturday to talk to activists protesting the death of Daunte Wright on April 11 â and to insist former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin be found guilty on all counts in Floydâs death.
âAnd then to listen to members of this body say, and I quote, âI hope we get a verdict that says guilty, guilty, guilty,'â Roy said during the hearing Tuesday, quoting Waters. ââAnd if we donât, we cannot go away. Weâve got to stay on the streets. We get more active. Weâve got to get more confrontational. Weâve got to make sure they know that we mean business.'â
These comments were problematic enough, having taken place in the Twin Cities area before the Chauvin jury was sequestered, that the judge in the case said they could be grounds for overturning the case on appeal.
âHow irresponsible can a member of Congress be than to say that and then to have the judge in the case that the whole nation is watching say that that might throw the case out on appeal?â Roy said. âThat is what weâre talking about.â
Meanwhile, Waters wasnât the only Democrat with an incendiary take on Chauvin and Wright. There was also Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib:
âWe are talking about the quote by another member of this body: âIt wasnât an accident. Policing in our country is inherently and intentionally racist. Iâm done with those who condone government-funded murder.â Government-funded murder,â Roy said. ââNo more policing.â Quote, âNo more policing.'â
ââNo more policing, incarceration, or militarization. It canât be reformed,ââ he continued. âTo say this is irrelevant? Itâs the central issue of our day right now to make sure this country is safe.â
Roy had previously called upon House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to sanction both members and remove them from their committees. This wouldnât be a small thing, particularly given Waters and Tlaib are two of the highest-profile members on the left flank of the Democratic Party and Waters is the chairwoman of the powerful House Financial Services Committee.
Whether Roy expected this to happen or not is anyoneâs guess â because Democrats couldnât even find it in them to censure Waters for remarks that could theoretically, if one is to go by Judge Peter Cahillâs remarks, end with the guilty verdict in the Chauvin trial being thrown out on appeal.
On Tuesday, Democrats blocked a resolution to censure Waters by a 216-210 party-line vote, according to CBS News. The resolution had been introduced by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, who said her remarks were âbeneath the dignityâ of the House and âraised the potential for violence, directed lawlessness, and may have interfered with a co-equal branch of government.â
Pelosi said she didnât believe Waters should apologize for her comments, either.
âMaxine talked about confrontation in the manner of the civil rights movement,â Pelosi said during a news conference Monday, according to the Daily Caller. âI myself think we should take our lead from the George Floyd family. Theyâve handled this with great dignity and no ambiguity or lack of misinterpretation by either side.â
âNo, no, I donât think should apologize,â she added.
And this is where we are in the modern Democratic Party. Waters can call for violence but itâs merely âconfrontation in the manner of the civil rights movement.â Tlaib can talk about defunding the police in the context of entirely dismantling Americaâs law enforcement apparatus, after a year of funding cuts have already decimated departments across the country, and thatâs all right.
Say what you will about the Democrats, theyâve accomplished one thing over the past year: Theyâve normalized anti-police rhetoric.
Whether a heated House Judiciary Committee markup hearing draws conservativesâ attention to the corrosion these kinds of remarks are causing is anyoneâs guess. Something has to.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.
