Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Appeals Prison Sentence, Seeks Immediate Release

Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal team is pressing a federal appeals court to undo what they describe as a deeply flawed prison sentence, arguing that the hip-hop mogul was punished for crimes a jury explicitly rejected…

Andrew PowellDec 24, 20253 min read

Sponsored

In July, a jury cleared the Bad Boy Records founder of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, but convicted him on two counts under the Mann Act, which prohibits transporting individuals across state lines for prostitution.

According to the defense, those convictions involved offenses that did not require proof of force, fraud, or coercion. Yet Combs’ lawyers argue that the sentencing judge treated the case as though the jury had returned guilty verdicts on the most serious allegations.

“The judge defied the jury’s verdict and found Combs ‘coerced,’ ‘exploited,’ and ‘forced’ his girlfriends to have sex and led a criminal conspiracy,” the filing states. “These judicial findings trumped the verdict and led to the highest sentence ever imposed for any remotely similar defendant.”

The defense accused Subramanian of acting like a “thirteenth juror,” contending that his remarks at sentencing effectively overrode the jury’s conclusions.

At the October sentencing hearing, Subramanian said he considered testimony from two former girlfriends who described violent and degrading encounters during their relationships with Combs.

Casandra “Cassie” Ventura told jurors that Combs ordered her to engage in sexual acts with male sex workers hundreds of times during their decade-long relationship. Jurors were also shown hotel surveillance footage depicting Combs dragging and striking her after one such encounter.

Another former girlfriend, identified in court only as “Jane,” testified that she felt pressured into participating in drug-fueled sexual encounters known as “hotel nights” between 2021 and 2024.

Rejecting the defense’s portrayal of those encounters, Subramanian said, “I reject the defense’s attempt to characterize what happened here as merely intimate, consensual experiences, or just a sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll story.”

“You abused the power and control that you had over the lives of women you professed to love dearly,” the judge added. “You abused them physically, emotionally, and psychologically.”

Combs’ attorneys argue those findings directly contradict the jury’s verdict and should not have influenced his sentence. The Appeals court has not yet scheduled oral arguments.