
MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle unsuccessfully pushed Democratic Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman to criticize the so-called oligarchy under President Donald Trumpâs administration.
Trump selected at least 13 billionaires to join his administration, the wealthiest in modern history, ABC News reported in December. During the full interview, which aired in part on âThe 11th Hour with Stephanie Ruhleâ on Tuesday and was fully posted to YouTube on Wednesday, Ruhle raised concerns about the unprecedented wealth in Trumpâs administration, but Fetterman downplayed the significance of their affluence and focused instead on ideological differences and political contributions.
WATCH:Â
đş Embedded media â coming soon
âPresident Trump is surrounded by the wealthiest cabinet, the wealthiest administration in modern U.S. history. Does this concern you?â Ruhle asked.
âI donât think itâs so much about their wealth. Itâs just because they might have some kind of the views or some things that I donât agree, and they would push a lot of decisions and changes in our government that I wouldnât support or would like to see happen in there too,â Fetterman responded. âSo it doesnât really follow their wealth for me. It just follows some of these kinds of core beliefs and the things that theyâre willing to push and to do.â
Ruhle followed up by asking Fetterman to opine on âthis idea that weâre sort of creating American oligarchs.â
The Pennsylvania senator responded by suggesting Democrats should not use the word âoligarchâ because the majority of Americans are not well-versed in the meaning of the term. He also called out Democrats for appreciating billionaires who are aligned with them.
âThereâs also another â a little secret too. Democrats, you know, we like billionaires if theyâre giving to our causes or to our party as well too,â he said.
Ruhle interrupted Fetterman to suggest there is âa difference between a very wealthy donorâ and having billionaires within a presidential administration.
âItâs unlimited money â thatâs the poison of American democracy. Get rid of unlimited money and then that would render billionaires on either side to those kinds of a thing,â Fetterman retorted. âAnd so remember, a lot of these billionaires that were in tech, they used to be more friendly to the Democratic interests in our party as well too. But unlimited money â get rid of that â and that would transform America more than any single other decision.â
Big Tech companies were previously anti-Trump, but have aligned with the president since his 2024 victory.
Ruhle agreed with Fetterman and referenced the Supreme Courtâs 2010 Citizens United decision. However, she doubled down on making a distinction between wealthy Americans making political contributions and working within government.
âThereâs a difference between very wealthy political donors and very wealthy people inside the government making decisions that could potentially enrich themselves and their businesses. Look at Elon Musk,â the MSNBC host said. âHe hasnât divested himself from his businesses and heâs a guy with $38 billion worth of government contracts. Thatâs different from being a Democratic donor who has the presidentâs ear or, at the very least, his phone number.â
âWell, what I would say is, is that sometimes itâs, you know â Iâm not sure if they necessarily are motivated just, you know, based on money, when, you know, most of those folks, whether itâs Bezos or Musk, they have far more than you can spend in a hundred lifetimes,â Fetterman responded. âSo for that, you know, I think scarcity defines the luxury. So thatâs why a lot of them want to be engaged on that, because they have unlimited money. So I think they want to just be part of the conversation.â
Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders echoed similar concerns to Ruhle during a Tuesday interview on âPod Save America,â claiming that Trump, Musk and Bezos had ushered in âthe scariest times in lifetime.â
âYou know, it is not just they want to give tax breaks to billionaires and cut programs to working people. Frankly, thatâs happened before,â Sanders said. âBut you combine that with the power of the oligarchy in general. You combine that with Mr. Musk owning Twitter and able to send out his messages to hundreds of millions of people.â
âYou combine that with the fact that people like Bezos, the second wealthiest person in the country, fired or got rid of most of his editorial staff and is going to convert âem into a right-wing thing,â he continued. âCombine that with the fact that Trump is suing major media outlets and is threatening to investigate PBS and NPR.â
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterâs byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
