
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy said Wednesday that special counsel Jack Smithās superseding indictment of former President Donald Trump will do little to accelerate his election interference case.
The Tuesday indictment includes the same four conspiracy and obstruction charges as the original, and it was submitted in response toĀ Supreme Courtās July ruling finding presidents are immune from prosecution for official acts they take during their presidency. McCarthy, on āCavuto: Coast to Coast,ā said regardless of how Judge Tanya Chutkan rules on the superseding indictment, Trump has the right to appeal it, which will delay the case well past the election.
WATCH:Ā
āI think that lawfare, whatever you think of it, has run its course as a determinant in the election. Nothingās gonna happen here, Neil, because remember, no matter what Judge Chutkan ultimately rules about this new indictment, itās still going to be a live immunity issue, which means Trump will be able to appeal to the D.C. circuit and the Supreme Court,ā McCarthy told host Neil Cavuto. āThis case is going nowhere before the election and I donāt think itās going anywhere before we have a new president. So, I think to the extent it was a factor in the election, thatās kind of run its course.ā
The charges Trump faces are one count of conspiracy to defraud the U.S., one count of conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, one count of obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, along with one count of conspiracy against rights. Trump was initially indicted on the same four counts in August 2023.
The new indictment was condensed from 45 pages to 36, and it removes allegations related to Trumpās āattempt to leverage the Justice Departmentā and adjusts language in certain sections to underscore the former president was acting outside his official capacity.
Former Chief of the Justice Departmentās Organized Crime and Gang Section Jim Trusty said Wednesday that Smith is attempting to avoid breaching the presidential immunity ruling with the fresh indictment. However, he noted Smith could misjudge which acts Chutkan will deem protected, potentially leading to another indictment process.
āItās really interesting because the opinion says, not just that immunized information is not properly before the court at trial, but that it contaminates the grand jury process. If you include that information in pursuing an indictment, thatās a huge land mine,ā Trusty said.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterās byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactĀ [email protected].
