Daily Caller News Foundation

Daily Caller News Foundation co-founder Tucker Carlson told a questioner at a Tuesday Turning Point USA (TPUSA) event that she was mistaken to suggest that President Donald Trump posting a video targeting a protest posed a threat to freedom of speech.

The presidentĀ posted the artificial intelligence (AI) video on Truth Social Saturday, which consisted of Trump wearing a crown and flying a fighter jet over a ā€œNo Kingsā€ protest, appearing to dump excrement on demonstrators. Carlson asserted at the ā€œThis is the Turning Point Tourā€ at Indiana University that there was a distinction between mocking people and barring them from public discourse.

WATCH:

ā€œIf you support that First Amendment right so much and you support the idea that the lesser powerful shouldn’t be suppressed by the more powerful, I would think that you would be against the president of the United States going on his social media and posting AI videos of him dropping shit on the protesters as he’s the more powerful and they’re the lesser powerful,ā€ the questioner said.

ā€œSo you can say, ā€˜I think it’s ugly that the president of the United States is posting naughty videos on his X account or whatever.’ Okay, fine. What I’m defending is the sacred, God-given right of every person to say what he believes. That’s called free speech,ā€ Carlson responded. ā€œThat’s what’s enshrined in our First Amendment. If you can name any example of the administration abridging that, I will agree with you 100% … But I don’t think that you’ve thought deeply enough about the difference between making fun of someone and preventing him from speaking. There’s a meaningful difference.ā€

The questioner appeared to claim she disagreed with Carlson’s characterization of her comments before he interrupted her to clarify.

ā€œYou said that because Trump posted a naughty cartoon on Twitter, he’s against the First Amendment,ā€ Carlson said.

Advertisement

ā€œHe’s against the protest, which is an example of practicing the First Amendment,ā€ the questioner replied.

Carlson disagreed.

ā€œNo, you can certainly make fun of a protest without preventing the protest from happening,ā€ he said.

ā€œThat’s an unacceptable way for the president to be acting though, because he is the president of the United States,ā€ the questioner said. ā€œHe can change people’s course of action.ā€

The crowd booed the questioner before Carlson concluded his argument.

ā€œou can make the case that he shouldn’t have done that because it’s unbecoming or whatever. Fair, fine. We can debate it. But I don’t think that you’re making the case he was abridging anyone’s First Amendment of criticizing. And this is part of the derangement of the left, that criticizing somebody is the same as committing violence against them or preventing them from speaking. That is not true.ā€

Moreover, Carlson distinguished Trump’s post and endeavoring to cause an individual to lose their job, arguing only the latter was ā€œa meaningful attempt to stifle speech.ā€

Advertisement

Democratic social media influencer Harry Sisson, who was the main target of the feces in the video, also told former CNN host Don Lemon on ā€œThe Don Lemon Showā€ Monday that the post supposedly signified the president’s desire to assault protesters who demonstrate against him.

ā€œNo Kingsā€ protests occured throughout the nation on Saturday, with organizers claimingĀ that around 7 million anti-Trump protesters demonstrated to ā€œreject authoritarianismā€ and declare that America does not belong to ā€œkings.ā€

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactĀ [email protected].