
In what can be described as political self-immolation, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) has introducedĀ legislationĀ that undermines a critical tool in our fight against woke capitalism and one of the few tools the average American consumer has to fight back against corporate goliaths. Tillisā proposal toĀ hogtieĀ third-party litigation funding threatens to weaken the mechanisms we rely on toĀ hold corporations accountable when they prioritize political and financial agendas over consumer interests.
Third-party litigation financingĀ isĀ a contract in which a third-party offers funding for a lawsuit in exchange for an interest in damages recovered. Without it, large corporations have the ability to crush opposition with high-priced lawyers and never-ending legal fees. But with litigation financing, everyday Americans can access the financial capital they need just to have a chance to fight back against companies that have increasingly participated in DEI-related discrimination, debanking and other aspects of the far-Leftās woke agenda.
While Sen. Tillis presents his bill unassumingly as a ātax,ā in truth, itĀ wouldĀ impose a 41% punitive levy on all litigation financing, with the clear intent of financially disincentivizing investors from supporting lawsuits. If passed, the legislationĀ wouldĀ further empower large, woke corporations like Bank of America, which has been accused ofĀ debankingĀ the accounts of Christian activist groups and conservatives; andĀ Nationwide, which threatened ligation after it was called out for attempting to rebrand its continuing DEI policies under the banner of ābelonging.ā
But it doesnāt stop with the woke agenda. Large companiesĀ wouldĀ love nothing more than to free themselves from the accountability that comes with litigation financing. For example, the notoriously woke ridesharing platform Uber has faced class action lawsuits fromĀ multipleĀ women over allegations of sexual assault by drivers ā including claims of kidnapping, rape, stalking, harassment, and other attacks. From 2017 to 2020, there were more thanĀ 9,998Ā cases of sexual assault on Uberās U.S. platform. Without financial support, in many instances, victimsĀ wouldĀ not have the means to face a company of Uberās size. Not so coincidentally, UberĀ isĀ at theĀ forefrontĀ of aĀ regulatory assault on third-party funded litigation and seeks to take away one of the few tools available to help these women fight back.
Perhaps no other sector has mobilized to oppose litigation finance to the extent of the insurance industry. Its two largest industry groups have a collective budget toppingĀ $93 millionĀ and a vested interest in knocking down lawsuits by manipulating the legislative system to choke off their funding. The National Association of Mutual Insurance CompaniesĀ isĀ pushing for nothing short of āan outright prohibitionā of all litigation finance.
Insurance companies can deny claims for a number of valid reasons, but weāve all heard horror stories of these companiesĀ refusing to payĀ whatās owed for legitimate claims. When faced with staggering financial payouts in the wake of natural disasters, for example, insurance companies have knowingly decided to act in bad faith by denying claims. Without third-party litigation financing, consumers facing a medical crisis or a devastating loss of propertyĀ wouldĀ lose access to the level of resources it takes to go after deep-pocketed bad actors.
Third-party litigation financingĀ isĀ vital in our fight against woke capitalism and something we at Consumersā Research believeĀ isĀ worth protecting. Sen. Tillisā needlessly broad legislationĀ would overregulate the industry and further disadvantage Americans in the fight against corporate political activists. This legislation should be reconsidered. Itās imperative that we remain vigilant against such legislative actions thatĀ couldĀ erode the safeguards protecting American consumers from the woke agenda.
Will Hild is the Executive Director of Consumersā Research, the nationās oldest consumer advocacy organization.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporterās byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contactĀ [email protected].
