Are Elizabeth Holmes Or Nathan Fielder Deceiving Us In ‘You Can See Anything’?
1 sourceUpdated Oct 20, 20261 min read
Sponsored
What each side asserts, disputes — or leaves out entirely.
Whose framing of this story rings truest to you?
Fielder always blurs lines on purpose, so maybe he's using Holmes to show how easy it is to fake sincerity again.
I don't buy Holmes claiming any redemption after Theranos, even if Fielder's setup makes the whole thing look staged.