Jay Jones Ignores 20 Years Of Supreme Court Rulings While Defending Virginia’s Semi-Auto Ban
Democratic Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones asked a court to throw out a suit against the state’s ban on modern semi-automatic firearms, ignoring multiple rulings by the United States Supreme Court in his filing.


Democratic Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones asked a court to throw out a suit against the state’s ban on modern semi-automatic firearms, ignoring multiple rulings by the United States Supreme Court in his filing.
Washington County Circuit Judge Jeffrey Campbell issued a statewide injunction blocking enforcement of SB 749, informing Jones and other officials that the order would take effect July 21. In the filing, Jones’ office argued that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution was not implication by the Virginia legislation, instead arguing that it was only tied to militia service, a finding by the Supreme Court in the 1939 case of United States v. Miller which was overturned in 2008.
“Contrary to Plaintiffs’ assertions, federal Second Amendment doctrine does not control the meaning of § 13 in this case,” the motion to dismiss claimed. “Given the history of § 13, federal law cannot displace the provision’s text, structure, and ratification history. Va. Const. Art I, § 13’s text and history establish a collective, militia-tethered right: a guarantee of a collective right tied to militia service; not a freestanding guarantee.”
Jones’ office did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
The Supreme Court rejected the militia argument in its 2008 Heller vs. District of Columbia decision, when it invalidated Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban after ruling that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to keep and bear arms. The filing from Jones’ office only mentioned Heller in the context of allowing regulation of “dangerous and unusual” weapons.



