Medical Technology Tariffs Make Health Care More Expensive
The great Arthur Laffer always tells us that when you tax something you get less of it, and when you tax something less you get more of it. That's why President Donald J. Trump's tariffs on medical technology produce less innovation and higher prices for patients.
Stephen Moore and Phil Kerpen·Oct 19, 2026·4 min read
💼Business
Sponsored
WASHINGTON — The great Arthur Laffer always tells us that when you tax something you get less of it, and when you tax something less you get more of it. That’s why President Donald J. Trump’s tariffs on medical technology produce less innovation and higher prices for patients.
Trump is at his best when he treats higher prices as the enemy. His historic tax cuts and regulations moved America in the right direction. So did his health care transparency rules and prescription drug reforms that let consumers buy drugs directly. When it comes to medical technology — the equipment that turned our hospitals into high-tech wonderlands — the administration’s principal policy has been a hefty tax in the form of tariffs.
That raises costs, especially in a healthcare sector where there is still far too little choice and competition. Those costs are passed on to patients either directly, through higher bills, or indirectly, through higher premiums or higher taxes that fund government health care programs.
The usual protectionist argument that domestic production can replace imports fails because technology supply chains are global and regulatory approval processes are long. The U.S. already dominates manufacturing these devices. But very few high-end machines can be made without foreign parts and systems that are being hit by Trump’s blanket tariffs, and replacing parts with alternative suppliers requires a costly and time-consuming FDA recertification process.
American-made products already command about 70 percent of the domestic medical tech market by value, supporting about three million direct and indirect jobs and generating $250 billion a year from more than 16,000 facilities in all 50 states, according to estimates from the industry group AdvaMed. These jobs have grown
Sponsored
Sponsored
Medical Technology Tariffs Make Health Care More Expensive — IJR
in 2024. This is not a domestic industry that needs protection from foreign competitors. It’s a booming engine of the American economy, but tariffs are driving up costs.
The remaining imports are not widgets somebody forgot to make in Ohio. They are the key parts of U.S. systems that only a handful of plants on earth know how to build. Superconducting MRI magnets are still wound in Oxford, England, because that is where the magnet line and the people who run it sit.
Medical cyclotrons, the $2 million to $4 million accelerators that make Positron Emission Tomography (PET)doses, are the same kind of product. Only a small set of firms in Belgium, Japan, and Canada sell them. American hospitals that install the machines do not have a mass-production alternative next door.
The isotope behind most nuclear-medicine scans is technetium-99m, made from molybdenum-99. The United States still imports its commercial Mo-99 from a few reactors in Europe, South Africa and Australia. Taxing it when it’s imported doesn’t conjure a domestic reactor. It does make building one more expensive.
Similar supply-chain impacts affect nearly every piece of high-end medical technology, and even if domestic suppliers are available, changing even a screw vendor can require full requalification. So, the price hit is real, and it lands on capital equipment hospitals replace rarely.
The stakes are especially high because they are not just economic. Higher taxes mean less investment in continuous improvement and innovation of devices that can save and extend lives.
America already dominates medical technology by value. To keep that lead, we should stop taxing the inputs and the specialized machines that complete U.S. products. The tariff on medical technology imports is functionally a tax on American plants, American hospitals and American patients. Trump should end it.
Stephen Moore is an economist and former Trump economic advisor who co-founded Unleash Prosperity NOW, an advocacy group promoting economic growth. Phil Kerpen is UPN’s president.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
