STEPHEN MOORE: Why Hasn’t Trump Repealed Biden’s $50 Billion Backdoor Business Tax Increase?
The Trump administration took a well-deserved victory lap last week for repealing more than 100 Biden era rules for every new regulation. This will save U.S. businesses potentially hundreds of billions of dollars of…


The Trump administration took a well-deserved victory lap last week for repealing more than 100 Biden era rules for every new regulation. This will save U.S. businesses potentially hundreds of billions of dollars of unnecessary costs. Gone are discriminatory racial preferences, the Green New Deal mandates, and electric vehicle mandates – to name a few.
Trump has solidly established himself as the “deregulation president.”
That’s why it’s an ongoing mystery why the Trump Treasury Department and IRS have refused to repeal one of Biden’s most onerous rules of all, targeting business partnerships for $50 billion of new tax liabilities. Business partnerships are a common legal form of American business arrangements.
This giant stealth tax increase was NEVER voted on or approved by Congress. It appears to be a blatant violation of the constitutional requirement that all tax bills start in the House of Representatives. The House never even saw this tax hike coming. Talk about a “danger to democracy.”
The U.S. has more than 4 million partnerships that could be affected, which employ more than 10 million people.
Many small family businesses use partnership arrangements routinely.
The Chamber of Commerce, the Heritage Foundation, Americans for Tax Reform, the National Taxpayers Union and Job Creators Network have all urged the GOP to rescind the Biden backdoor tax increase.
Back in September The Wall Street Journal pummeled the Biden rules as an “extra-legal plot” to go around Congress and squeeze higher business taxes out of employers. The Journal notes that the tax hike was finalized just days before President Trump took office, as part of its quest for more revenue to pay for trillions of dollars of budget-busting programs.
These partnership rules are “functioning like the administrative state’s own version of a deep state rebellion,” writes


