Newsom says he would not run if Harris enters 2028 race
By The Conservative Desk (/journals/conservative-desk)
California Gov. Gavin Newsom stood waist-deep in the Bitterroot River at his in-laws’ Bitterroot Springs Ranch in Montana, fly-fishing with CNN’s Jake Tapper, when he drew the clearest line yet on the 2028 Democratic contest. “I wouldn’t run if she ran.”
The pair caught a couple of fish during the long interview reported around Sept. 14, 2026. Newsom checked his hook and cast again while laying out the electoral math that would keep him on the sidelines if former Vice President Kamala Harris entered the race. “First of all, electorally, it’s a gift from God for everybody else. They’d enjoy the hell out of it. Mutual assured destruction. It serves no greater good. Why would I do this if I wasn’t trying to serve some greater good? There would be no upside whatsoever.”
Tapper pressed the obvious counter. Harris had already sought the presidency twice—falling short before the 2020 primary and losing the general election in 2024—while Newsom had never run. Newsom conceded the point on the spot. “That would be the case you’d make. Pretty good one, actually. That’s objectively true.” Then he explained why the argument did not move him. “But I know what that means. I know her base of supporters, I know her friends, the (Venn) diagram on that is just pure crossover … I wouldn’t do that to people. I wouldn’t put them in that position … Every other Democrat is praying for that, and every other Republican is gonna pray for that. And that’s just not gonna happen.”
He repeated the refusal when Tapper circled back. “Of course not, why would I? I wouldn’t do it to her. I wouldn’t do it to you. I wouldn’t waste everyone’s time.” The same deference had appeared months earlier. In March 2026 Newsom told Axios, “When she goes, she goes first.”
The interview unfolded against an expanding federal investigation that Newsom himself disclosed in June 2026. He described the probe into his finances and those of his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, as politically motivated. Subpoenas reviewed by The San Francisco Standard show investigators have sought six years of records tied to the California State Protocol Foundation, the nonprofit that funds Newsom’s international travel, along with communications from current and former aides. For taxpayers who underwrite state government and watch nonprofit dollars underwrite a governor’s overseas trips, the paper trail matters. Accountability under the rule of law does not pause because a politician is weighing a White House bid; the records now in play will test whether the foundation’s spending and the aides’ correspondence withstand ordinary scrutiny.
Newsom has four school-aged children. Two of them currently oppose a presidential run. Family consent, he said, is non-negotiable. “I am not screwing anything up anymore, man. I know what matters in life. I got four kids, it’s the only thing that matters to me.” He returned to the same theme when discussing readiness. “I have no experience in this process, so I’m going through it.” Looking back at 2024, he said he had not been prepared to challenge the incumbent. “I wasn’t ready. First of all, I wouldn’t do that. And second, if I did, I would have gotten crushed because I didn’t have a why. You don’t have big enough why, then you don’t belong there.” He added, “It’s shocking how many presidential candidates can’t answer their why. Like, shocking.”
During the hours on the water and around the ranch, Newsom also spoke about his dyslexia, his failed first marriage, an affair with the wife of a mayoral aide, his mother’s assisted suicide, a friend who told him he needed to get his shit together, the California governor’s race, COVID-19, and his clashes with President Trump. The personal inventory sat beside the political calculation. He insisted any future candidacy would require him to “meet the moment” rather than simply make a point.
Harris told the Los Angeles Times last week that she had not decided whether she will run again. The same paper reported polls showing her with a double-digit lead over Newsom in a hypothetical 2028 matchup, while also finding greater enthusiasm for Newsom among California’s major donors earlier this year. Newsom has already visited states including South Carolina and Michigan. Harris has conducted a book tour and weighed in on midterm races. The Hill noted that two Californians—and potentially three if Rep. Ro Khanna joins—could complicate efforts to reach independents and disaffected Republicans, given the shared deep-blue home state.
The practical effect of Newsom’s Montana pledge is to leave the first move to Harris while the federal paper trail lengthens. Subpoenas covering six years of foundation records and aide communications continue. Newsom’s own standard remains the one he voiced while the river moved past his waders: a candidacy without a sufficient “why,” or one that merely splits the same base, serves no greater good and wastes everyone’s time. Two of his four children have already said no. The next decision that matters sits with Harris and with the investigators still collecting documents.