Itâs long been rumored that, if Donald Trump wins the GOP presidential nomination for a third time, heâll pick a woman as his running mate. If he does, donât expect that woman to be one of his primary opponents â at least if Donald Trump Jr. has anything to say about it.
In an interview with Newsmax, Trump Jr. said heâd âgo to great lengthsâ to ensure former U.N. ambassador and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley would stay off the ticket, arguing that her tendencies toward globalism and American interventionism in foreign conflicts would make her untenable.
This is the second interview Trump Jr. has given this month in which he slagged Haley as a puppet of the establishment meant to end his fatherâs career.
In the latest salvo in Haleyâs direction, which came during an interview with Eric Bolling on the day after Christmas, Trump Jr. said that he âwouldnât have herâ as a veep candidate.
âNikki Haley wants never-ending wars,â Trump Jr. said.
âSheâs a puppet of the establishment in Washington, D.C. Sheâs the new favorite candidate of the billionaire class because they want control â no different than academia and Harvard and using their billions to exercise influence.â
âShe is now the preferred candidate,â he added.
This comes after an interview with Breitbart earlier this month, after the last Republican primary debate, in which Trump Jr. said Vivek Ramaswamy âbasically ended Nikki Haleyâs political career.â
âThe same people that used to support DeSantis because they thought he was the guy to take out Trump, so that they can have their dancing monkey in the White House â someone who needs them, who needs their dollars â they flipped over to Nikki Haley, and theyâre trying to make that the last hope, so that they can have that kind of control,â he said.
âItâs really sad because thatâs what this is about.â
Others in Trumpâs orbit have criticized Haley for the same reasons â including former Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who said in an interview with conservative personality Tim Pool that heâd actively campaign against a Trump-Haley ticket.
âI would not only not vote for that ticket, I would advocate against it as strongly as I could,â Carlson said earlier this week. âThatâs just poison.â
He went on to say that Haley was âsomeone whoâs actively opposed to the interests of the country I grew up in, who endorsed the BLM riots and who is not left but is neoliberal in the darkest, most ⌠nihilistic way and has no real popular support, is a creature of the oligarchs. So yeah, that would be â that would be reason to oppose the ticket.â
However, there are those in Trumpâs orbit who support the former South Carolina governor â namely his daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, who said that Haleyâs nomination was in the ânever say neverâ zone:
There is, of course, a better argument against Nikki Haley than interventionism, globalism or moderate-ism, assuming Donald Trump is the nominee. For the most part, the 2024 Republican presidential race is a referendum on Trump and being in it necessarily implies youâre voting no on the four years of his presidency, for whatever reason.
Vivek Ramaswamy has come the closest to moving away from this, arguing that, while Trumpâs presidency was productive, he antagonizes a wide swath of undecided voters. Pretty much everyone else has either made it clear â albeit not in direct terms, unless youâre a fringe contender like Chris Christie or Asa Hutchinson â that their candidacy would reject a Trump-ist populism and take the country in a different direction.
If she wins the nomination on that premise, great. More power to her. Vox populi, vox elephanti. However, if one runs on that premise â unless itâs much, much closer than polls at the moment indicate â one shouldnât turn around and expect to get the vice presidential nomination. It wouldnât be prudent for either personâs political future. And, not only that, itâd make for some uncomfortable back-and-forths with the first son should a Trump-Haley ticket manage to retake the White House.
This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.