• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
From left: Special Counsel Jack Smith, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon and former President Donald Trump.

Jack Smith’s Nuclear Option Will Directly Target Judge in Trump Trial

April 6, 2024
Trump Admin Moves to Scrap Biden-Era LGBTQ Foster Care Rule

Trump Admin Moves to Scrap Biden-Era LGBTQ Foster Care Rule

March 6, 2026
ALFREDO ORTIZ: American Economy Much Stronger Than Jobs Report Suggests

ALFREDO ORTIZ: American Economy Much Stronger Than Jobs Report Suggests

March 6, 2026
‘Squad’ Among 53 Democrats Voting Against Iran Terror Resolution

‘Squad’ Among 53 Democrats Voting Against Iran Terror Resolution

March 6, 2026
Democratic State Senator Claims ICE Is To Blame For Illegal Butchering Virginia Mom

Democratic State Senator Claims ICE Is To Blame For Illegal Butchering Virginia Mom

March 6, 2026
Mexico Bankrolls Liberal Attorneys Helping Migrant Killers Escape Death Row

Mexico Bankrolls Liberal Attorneys Helping Migrant Killers Escape Death Row

March 6, 2026
Democrats’ Great Texas Senate Hope Has History Of Pushing Far-Left Priorities Down Students’ Throats

Democrats’ Great Texas Senate Hope Has History Of Pushing Far-Left Priorities Down Students’ Throats

March 6, 2026
CNN Panel Goes Haywire After Iranian Political Prisoner Says Trump Did Not Start War With Iran

CNN Panel Goes Haywire After Iranian Political Prisoner Says Trump Did Not Start War With Iran

March 6, 2026
Peter Schweizer Says Biden Border Crisis ‘Probably Right Up There With 9/11’ And Pearl Harbor

Peter Schweizer Says Biden Border Crisis ‘Probably Right Up There With 9/11’ And Pearl Harbor

March 6, 2026
CNN Data Analyst Says Americans Overwhelmingly Support Trump’s Decision To Remove Noem

CNN Data Analyst Says Americans Overwhelmingly Support Trump’s Decision To Remove Noem

March 6, 2026
Trump Demands ‘Unconditional Surrender’ by Iran

Trump Demands ‘Unconditional Surrender’ by Iran

March 6, 2026
Trump Demands ‘Unconditional Surrender’ To End Iran War

Trump Demands ‘Unconditional Surrender’ To End Iran War

March 6, 2026
US Lost Jobs In February, Showing Weaker Economy Than Expected

US Lost Jobs In February, Showing Weaker Economy Than Expected

March 6, 2026
  • Donald Trump
  • Tariffs
  • Congress
  • Faith
  • Immigration
Friday, March 6, 2026
  • Login
IJR
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls
No Result
View All Result
IJR
No Result
View All Result
Home Commentary

Jack Smith’s Nuclear Option Will Directly Target Judge in Trump Trial

by Western Journal
April 6, 2024 at 8:28 pm
in Commentary
731 30
0
From left: Special Counsel Jack Smith, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon and former President Donald Trump.

From left: Special Counsel Jack Smith, U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon and former President Donald Trump. (@axios / X screen shot)

1.5k
SHARES
4.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Special counsel Jack Smith appears to be losing his patience in his case against former President Donald Trump over classified documents that were found at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Smith is reportedly considering “pushing the nuclear button” in taking U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon off of the case which she currently presides over, per NBC News.

A court filing from this week had the special counsel legal team questioning Cannon’s willingness to consider a push from Trump’s legal counsel to dismiss the case.

The former president’s legal team argued that the DOJ has no right to turn the issue of presidential records into a criminal case.

Cannon ultimately dismissed that on Thursday, refusing to issue a separate court order on the issue.

In the three-page ruling, she left arguments for Trump to continue questioning the validity of the case open but ultimately denied it for the moment.

The decision comes as both good and bad for both sides of the case.

Of course, for Smith, the judge denying the possibility of the case being dismissed is undeniably a positive as the legal prosecution of Trump will continue.

Unfortunately, it also undermines the court filing that was done in an attempt to get Cannon removed from the case, ultimately making it nearly impossible for the special counsels’ legal team to remove the judge.

Special counsel Jack Smith’s blistering response this week to a request by Judge Aileen Cannon was one of several instances over the last 10 months challenging her competency or impartiality in a case involving Trump’s handling of classified secrets.https://t.co/DlHGHIlsqW

— Axios (@axios) April 5, 2024

For Trump, getting his argument to dismiss the case denied is undoubtedly a negative as a dismissal would be fantastic for him but keeping Cannon — a judge described as “MAGA-friendly” by The Daily Beast — on the case will likely help him in the future.

Additionally, the ability for his team to continue debating whether The Presidential Records Act — a law that forces presidents to turn over presidential records but keep personal documents — has any effect on the case keeps home alive for potential dismissal.

While Smith vehemently denies the act playing any part in the ongoing case, Cannon keeping it open undoubtedly irks the special counsel.

The desperation of Smith to take any measure to ensure Trump sees punishment shows the reality of the case.

He is not interested in any legal arguments surrounding the classified documents case. He just wants to see Trump get in trouble.

Should Judge Cannon remain in place over this trial?

Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Yes: 25% (1 Votes)
No: 75% (3 Votes)

It’s equally obvious as whenever President Joe Biden sees an extremely similar investigation done by Special Counsel Robert Hur who concludes he also kept classified documents after leaving office, no charges are leveled against him.

Of course, Hur and Smith are separate people whose decisions were not intertwined but it shows the double standard that’s pushed.

The Democrats continue to show they’ll do anything to prosecute the former president regardless of how wrong or right it is.


This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

Tags: Department of JusticeDonald TrumplawsuitProsecuting Trump
Share592Tweet370
Western Journal

Western Journal

Advertisements

Top Stories June 10th
Top Stories June 7th
Top Stories June 6th
Top Stories June 3rd
Top Stories May 30th
Top Stories May 29th
Top Stories May 24th
Top Stories May 23rd
Top Stories May 21st
Top Stories May 17th

Join Over 6M Subscribers

We’re organizing an online community to elevate trusted voices on all sides so that you can be fully informed.





IJR

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Trusted Voices On All Sides

  • About Us
  • GDPR Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Editorial Standards & Corrections Policy
  • Subscribe to IJR

Follow Us

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • US News
  • Commentary
  • World News
  • Faith
  • Latest Polls

    Copyright © 2024 IJR

Top Stories June 10th Top Stories June 7th Top Stories June 6th Top Stories June 3rd Top Stories May 30th Top Stories May 29th Top Stories May 24th Top Stories May 23rd Top Stories May 21st Top Stories May 17th