America First Is Good Policy For Our National Parks

Pick the most trusted part of our government. Like many, you might say the national parks. After all, they are not seemingly political or controversial. They’re beloved. And rightfully so.

Now pick some of the most controversial topics in today’s national discussion, like data centers, “energy efficient” technology, or even Chinese relations. Many would be shocked to know that there is a connection between our beloved national parks and these points of controversy.

The connection? NGOs (non-governmental organizations). 

One might be surprised to know that NGOs with connections to foreign adversaries like China and extremist progressive interests are intertwined with our national parks. But they are.

Indeed, unelected activist groups — at best — have learned how to influence federal policy without ever participating in the democratic process. One method they use is through litigation, by exploiting otherwise well-intentioned laws to tie up major infrastructure projects. Or, they will use sue and settle—where they sue a like-minded agency that will then “settle” the matter in a way that changes policy — tactics to change laws without any public scrutiny or democratic process. To make matters worse, federal money often flows, directly or indirectly, to these NGOs, keeping them afloat and sometimes even growing into behemoths. 

Data centers are a prime example. Correct usage of data centers will improve many facets of American society. For everyday life, they create jobs and can lower the tax burden. For the AI race, they can give the United States an advantage. For national security, they can help prevent foreign adversaries from controlling our technologies. 

Yet, the messaging is anything but positive. Through NGOs connected to Chinese influence, messaging is strongly anti-data center, and often misleading. 

For example, the Prince William Digital Gateway project, which would have been near the Manassas Battlefield, was axed through NGO messaging and litigation tactics. NGO messaging relied heavily on the idea that we shouldn’t have data centers where there are national parks. But the data center would only be near a national park. The proximity was exploited and created terrible precedent, which NGO leaders admitted was the plan.

One might question the claims of corruption and nefarious ties of these NGOs, but a recent Council to Modernize Governance paper demonstrates numerous examples.