
Americans have two more years to argue about who should win the next presidential election. They have less than a week, however, to decide who will write many of its rules. As a new report from Honest Elections Project Action shows, “who” writes the rules largely determines what those rules will be.
On Nov. 3, voters will elect governors and state legislators with the power to overhaul American elections. Political control of critical presidential battlegrounds is on the line and Democrats are poised to use any new trifectas they gain this November to unwind crucial voting safeguards ahead of 2028.
They have even put one of the most dangerous election-law rewrites on the table: A plan to radically change how America elects the president before 2028 — without a constitutional amendment.
Eighteen blue states plus D.C. have already joined the
National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Each pledged to award its presidential electors to the national popular vote winner, even if the candidate is rejected by that state’s own voters. Virginia joined in April, bringing the compact to 222 electoral votes, just 48 short of the 270 needed to purportedly activate it.
Pennsylvania, Michigan and Arizona together hold 45 electoral votes. If those three joined, adding either Wisconsin or Nevada would put the compact over the threshold. All five of those states have divided government today. Democrats are one election away from removing that obstacle.
The left claims the NPV compact merely bolsters “democracy,” but don’t be fooled. It is nothing short of an end run around the Constitution itself, a scheme to neutralize the Electoral College and shift power away from competitive swing states to permanent Democrat strongholds like New York and California. Blue states with the loosest rules — all-mail voting, late ballots, abusive ballot harvesting laws and more — would have more sway than ever before. That would be a disaster for election integrity, inviting instant litigation and plunging the 2028 election into chaos.
Even if Democrats fall short of activating the compact, there is little to stop any new liberal political trifectas from rewriting all the other rules that govern elections—with massive implications for free and fair elections.
The new report examined this year’s state legislative record and found a clear partisan divide. Republican trifectas kept their focus on verifying citizenship, maintaining accurate voter rolls and strengthening voter ID requirements — the safeguards Americans overwhelmingly want to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat. Democratic trifectas moved in the polar opposite direction. The number of election laws these blue states enacted spiked 82 percent from last year, climbing from under 19 percent to roughly 38 percent, the fastest growth of any bloc.
Democratic lawmakers fought relentlessly to rewrite election rules for their own political benefit. Over the past year, they’ve pursued automatic voter registration despite recent, major failures. In New Jersey, a Motor Vehicle software error automatically registered roughly 6,600 noncitizens and about 400 of them voted — a failure Democratic Gov. Mikie Sherrill herself admitted. Liberal lawmakers also expanded mail voting, extended ballot receipt deadlines and restricted officials’ ability to check voter citizenship against federal records.
To date, not a single Democrat trifecta requires proof of citizenship to register to vote.
Virginia is the preview. Democrats
gained full control in January and have been rewriting its election laws ever since. In a single session they expanded
ranked-choice voting, a system that
19 states have banned or restricted;
limited officials’ use of a federal database to check voter citizenship; and
extended to 5 p.m. a deadline allowing mail ballots to arrive a full three days after Election Day. They also rammed through a new congressional map to give themselves 10 of the state’s 11 House seats.
Thankfully, the Virginia Supreme Court
voided the effort because Democratic legislators had failed to follow the required constitutional process. The rest of their agenda stands. In fact, Virginia Democrats would likely have done
even more if prior trifectas had not already gutted voter ID requirements and mandated an absurd six weeks of early voting.
Two roads diverge this November. Republicans have used their majorities to verify voter eligibility and improve election administration. Democrats have used theirs to weaken those checks and rewrite the rules to keep power. Now they hope to rig how the winner of the presidency itself is determined.
Fortunately, voters still hold the power and this November they will decide which course the nation sets. In Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, a Democrat sweep would mean Virginia-style “reforms” almost overnight and could put the popular-vote compact within reach before 2028. The future of free and fair elections in America is on this ballot.
Jason Snead is the Executive Director of Honest Elections Project Action.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].