Two petitions have brought in more than 500,000 signatures each calling for actor Johnny Deppâs role in the âPirates of the Caribbean franchiseâ to be restored.
One petition titled, âJustice for Johnny Depp,â has garnered more than 572,000 signatures as of Monday.
âJohnny Depp has been a phenomenal actor throughout his career. Depp was removed from the movie Pirates of the Caribbean by Walt Disneyâs Company,â the petition stated.
It claims âthis unfortunately is due to his ex wife Amber Heard lying and stating that Depp beat her.â
It continued, âAmber Heard ruined Johnny Deppâs life as well as career. Johnny Depp has always been one of the greatest actors ever since he started acting around the age of 21. This man NEVER disappoints when he makes a movie, so why continue to keep him from doing Pirates of the Caribbean??â
The petition suggested, âThat movie is nothing without him!â
It argues Depp âdeserves his life back the way it was before Amber Heard came along, because no actor or actress could ever say this man is not an amazing actor.â
Another petition titled, âWe want JOHNNY DEPP back as CAPTAIN JACK SPARROW,â attracted more than 800,000 signatures.
âDonât they know that without Johnny Depp or Jack Sparrow they will sink, they will never be able to reach that horizon,â the petition stated.
It continues, âThey have to bring him back to rule the seas again, UNLESS it is actorâs own choice to withdraw from the role.â
Depp is suing his ex-wife Amber Heard for $50 million, accusing her of defaming him in an op-ed for The Washington Post, as Fox News reported.

In the op-ed, Heard claimed she was the victim of domestic and emotional abuse.
Daniel Gutenplan, who has represented clients in high-profile defamation cases, told Fox News, âAs most defamation plaintiffs have, Depp and his team have an uphill battle and have a challenge in proving the case because they have to prove, first of all, that anything that was said is completely false.â
He explained, âThe Washington Post piece in question, of course, doesnât mention Mr. Depp by name, although, his camp will argue â and I think itâs a compelling argument â that a reasonable reader will assume that the article was written about Mr. Depp.â
Additionally, Gutenplan pointed out the op-ed âalso does not mention any specific instances of abuse or events. So it doesnât say, âOn this date, at this time or at this place, this thing happened. He did this to me.â It just generally references being a victim of abuse.â
Gutenplan is not involved in the proceedings, as Fox News reported.
The outlet noted a cross-examination of Heardâs claims will begin on May 16 at 9 a.m.
