A Republican lawmaker is taking aim at President Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Ketanji Brown Jackson, after a moment from her confirmation hearing went viral.

Rep. Bob Good (R-Va.) spoke on the House floor where he said to the chair, ā€œThank you, Person Speaker.ā€

ā€œI say Person Speaker because I’m not a biologist, and out of respect to our Supreme Court nominee I don’t feel qualified to say Madam Speaker,ā€ he added.

Watch the video below:

Good was opposing an insulin bill, the Affordable Insulin Now Act, which the House of Representatives passed on Thursday.

The measure ā€œcaps cost-sharing under private health insurance for a month’s supply of selected insulin products at $35 or 25% of a plan’s negotiated price (after any price concessions), whichever is less, beginning in 2023.ā€

It now goes to the Senate.

Good’s remarks targeting Biden’s Supreme Court nominee refer to a moment during her confirmation hearing when Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) asked the judge, ā€œCan you provide a definition for the word ā€˜woman’?ā€

Advertisement

The judge asked, ā€œCan I provide a definition?ā€

After confirming that was her question, Jackson said, ā€œI can’t.ā€

She then explained, ā€œNot in this context I’m not a biologist.ā€

In case you missed it:

Blackburn pressed Jackson, ā€œSo, you believe the meaning of the word ā€˜woman’ is so unclear and controversial that you can’t give me a definition?ā€

ā€œSenator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there’s a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law and I decide,ā€ the judge claimed.

However, the Republican lawmaker shot back, ā€œThe fact that you can’t give me a straight answer about something as fundamental as what a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about.ā€

Following her comments, USA Today cited ā€œscientists, gender law scholars and philosophers of biologyā€ who agree Jackson’s response was ā€œcommendable, though perhaps misleading.ā€

Advertisement

ā€œThere isn’t one single ā€˜biological’ answer to the definition of a woman. There’s not even a singular biological answer to the question of ā€˜what is a female,'ā€ Rebecca Jordan-Young, a scientist and gender studies scholar at Barnard College, told USA Today.

The article said, ā€œThere are at least six different biological markers of ā€˜sex’ in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous.ā€

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) brought up the back-and-forth between Jackson and Blackburn when he said, ā€œYesterday under questioning from Senator Blackburn, you told her that you couldn’t define what a woman is, that you are not a biologist, which I think you are the only Supreme Court nominee in history who has been unable to answer the question, ā€˜What is a woman?ā€

He asked, ā€œLet me ask you as a judge, how would you determine if a plaintiff had Article 3 standing to challenge a gender based rule, regulation, policy without being able to determine what a woman was?ā€

ā€œI know that I am a woman, I know that Senator Blackburn is a woman,ā€ Jackson said, adding, ā€œAnd the woman who I admire most in the world is in the room today – my mother.ā€