Texas Judge Unleashes Scathing Dissent After Redrawn Map is Blocked
A federal judge in Texas issued a blistering dissent this week after a three-judge panel threw out the state’s newly redrawn congressional map, delivering a ruling that immediately set off political and judicial…

A federal judge in Texas issued a blistering dissent this week after a three-judge panel threw out the state’s newly redrawn congressional map, delivering a ruling that immediately set off political and judicial shockwaves.
According to Fox News, Judge Jerry Smith, a Reagan appointee on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, erupted over the 2-1 decision, calling it “the most blatant exercise of judicial activism that I have ever witnessed.”
Smith’s dissent, spanning more than 100 pages, repeatedly targeted the majority opinion’s author, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown, a Trump appointee. Smith accused Brown of “pernicious judicial misbehavior,” naming him hundreds of times throughout the filing.
The majority opinion, Smith claimed, would be “a prime candidate” for a “Nobel Prize for Fiction.”
He went further, insisting that “the main winners from Judge Brown’s opinion are George Soros and Gavin Newsom,” while “the obvious losers are the People of Texas and the Rule of Law.”
Smith, who graduated from Yale Law School, wrote that “if this were a law school exam, the opinion would deserve an ‘F.’”



