NYT Blasted for Alleged Anti-Trans Bias in Its Coverage: 'Appalling'
“The New York Times has stood for something else: irresponsible, biased coverage of transgender people.”
“The New York Times has stood for something else: irresponsible, biased coverage of transgender people.”
“The inexplicably tone-deaf article places [NY Times] back in an uncomfortable national spotlight.”
“The context does not help.”
“Starting off with how they admit they want to erase pregnant women.”
“Stay in your lane.”
“We want our pension intact. We want our health care funded. We want raises that reflect our contribution to the company’s success.”
“Racism wasn’t a thing before, but now it is says [The New York Times].”
“I haven’t done anything wrong, on any level.”
“I never apologized for publishing the piece and still don’t.”
“It just came up out of my system.”
“Just have to fight trouble making creeps like Maggie, and all the rest!”
“The reality is that he treats everyone like they are his psychiatrists—reporters, government aides, and members of Congress, friends and pseudo-friends and rally attendees and White House staff and customers.”
“I don’t accept a Jew, Israeli or Zionist, or anyone else who speaks Hebrew.”
“…the Court has reached its conclusions with fealty to the law as its primary concern, with no consideration of the rancorous political debate associated with these cases.”
“I think we can’t rule it out.”
“The court did it for them.”